Home› Latest Research› Amazon› Realizing the Fermionic Laughlin State on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor

AMAZON WEB SERVICES

Realizing the Fermionic Laughlin State on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor

Researchers realize the ν = 1/3 fermionic Laughlin state on an IonQ trapped-ion quantum processor accessed through Amazon Braket, combining Hamiltonian design, variational state preparation and error mitigation.

JUN 2026 AMAZON WEB SERVICES > AMAZON BRAKET / NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
AWS and JPMorganChase quantum computing research collaboration

Why simulate a Laughlin state?

The Laughlin state is a paradigmatic example of topologically ordered quantum matter associated with the fractional quantum Hall effect.

Material systems that naturally realize such phases are difficult to probe and control. A programmable quantum processor offers another route: construct a Hamiltonian whose ground state has the desired topological structure and prepare that state directly.

The 2026 experiment targets the ν = 1/3 fermionic Laughlin state, whose properties include fractionalization, incompressibility and long-range entanglement.

ν = 1/3

A Hamiltonian variational ansatz

The researchers build a Hamiltonian variational ansatz using an effective Hamiltonian that retains dominant interaction terms needed to reproduce the target physics.

The protocol is designed to preserve relevant symmetries while keeping the number of variational parameters manageable. This makes the state-preparation circuit more suitable for hardware.

The experiment used a 16-qubit circuit with 369 two-qubit gates for the demonstrated state-preparation workflow.

01

INPUT

The researchers build a Hamiltonian variational ansatz using an effective Hamiltonian that retains dominant interaction terms needed to reproduce the target physics.

02

METHOD

The protocol is designed to preserve relevant symmetries while keeping the number of variational parameters manageable. This makes the state-preparation circuit more suitable for hardware.

03

OUTPUT

The experiment used a 16-qubit circuit with 369 two-qubit gates for the demonstrated state-preparation workflow.

Why trapped ions?

The experiment used IonQ trapped-ion processors accessed through Amazon Braket. The researchers selected trapped-ion hardware because the experiment required a comparatively deep circuit and benefited from high two-qubit gate fidelity and low readout error.

The work used Aria 1 for density and correlation measurements and Forte 1 for randomized measurements used to estimate the second-order Rényi entropy.

Symmetry-verification and hardware error-mitigation techniques were incorporated into the experimental workflow.

01

INPUT

The experiment used IonQ trapped-ion processors accessed through Amazon Braket. The researchers selected trapped-ion hardware because the experiment required a comparatively deep circuit and benefited from high two-qubit gate fidelity and low readout error.

02

METHOD

The work used Aria 1 for density and correlation measurements and Forte 1 for randomized measurements used to estimate the second-order Rényi entropy.

03

OUTPUT

Symmetry-verification and hardware error-mitigation techniques were incorporated into the experimental workflow.

How was the topological state verified?

The experiment did not rely on a single measurement. It examined edge and bulk density structure, correlation holes and topological entanglement entropy.

The measured quantities showed agreement with exact-diagonalization benchmarks for the demonstrated system.

This observable-centered verification is important because a complicated quantum state cannot be established merely by showing that a circuit executed successfully.

Potential applications

The approach provides a route for studying strongly correlated topological phases on programmable quantum processors.

The same strategy could be extended to other topological states and quasiparticle excitations, although those extensions require larger and more capable hardware.

More broadly, the work demonstrates how quantum processors can be used as experimental platforms for many-body states that are difficult to realize or probe directly in conventional materials.

What should you take away from this research?

01

The core idea

The experiment demonstrates an end-to-end workflow for preparing and diagnosing a material-inspired topological quantum state on digital hardware.

02

Why it matters

The combination of symmetry-aware ansatz design, trapped-ion hardware and error mitigation was central to making the experiment feasible.

03

What remains open

The demonstrated system remains small, but the methodology provides a concrete benchmark for future quantum simulations of strongly correlated matter.

This research should be read in the context of current quantum hardware and hybrid computing constraints. The results described here are research demonstrations, models or workflows rather than evidence that quantum processors have already replaced classical methods for general-purpose workloads.

Read the original research

Shen et al., Realization of fermionic Laughlin state on a quantum processor, Nature Communications 17, 4919 (2026).

READ SOURCE ↗